I found this link to Portable Classrooms in Victoria.
http://www.architectus.com.au/index.php?page=164
It is about the State Government budgeting for permanent classrooms to be put into school, and goes on to say how relieved schools are for this donation. So many schools have portable classrooms, which are note considered part of the school, yet have been there for many years now.
Here's a quote out of it.
Portables are rarely regarded as part of the school. They are accepted as necessary to cope with medium term numbers in excess of the core enrollment or as temporary emergency measures but not as a significant long term component of the school infrastructure. Due to funding limitations, portables often stay around longer than intended and “wear out their welcome.”
Anyway I just thought it was interesting to read how negative the feedback is on the current portables, and it makes the project that we're doing more exciting knowing there is a huge need for portables to be improved so that people want them in their schools.
Because even though there is funding in Victoria for permanent structures, there will always be the need for portable classrooms, as numbers will always increase, or something could happen to an existing school in which case they need quick structures to insure education proceeds as soon as possible. I also see the potential for portables be use in remote areas where it may be more difficult to get building materials and available labour.
In the end though, RARE needs to be the way of the future, not just for schooling. We need to find better ways to re-use materials that have already been used, rather than using new materials everywhere. The earths sources for us to use are rapidly depleting and the waste we create from how readily we demolition an exisiting building is horrendous.
I'm finding this assignment very relative to the direction I know architecture needs to go...